Service station not approved
A SERVICE station will not be built at 135 Union Street, South Lismore, with Lismore City Council refusing the development application at a recent council meeting.
The proposed servo was planned for where the Skimmo’s Corner Store sits, but council was concerned about the impact on the environment, social and economic impacts and thought it wasn’t in the public interest due to “the risk to the safety of the customers/occupants, adjoining owners, pedestrians and vehicles”.
The Skimmo’s Corner Store has been providing takeaway food and drink to the community for more than 60 years with the business operative since about 1957.
Following community consultation and the public exhibition of the proposed service station, three public submissions were received together with a petition opposing the development with 540 signatures. There are now 1800 signatures on the petition.
The council report stated the proposed permissible redevelopment of the site was considered to provide additional public benefits to the South Lismore locality in that it activated not only a new business within the precinct, but it was seen to afford improved economic intensity of the three current titles resulting in positive economic impacts.
It also noted, given the nature of the site, the proposed use and the surrounding properties, there was potential for adverse impacts, particularly upon the residential amenity of the surrounding properties.
Cr Neil Marks, who supported the development, said he was aware there were great concerns about losing an iconic building such as Skimmo’s as it held a lot of history for a lot of people, but he proposed the building could be moved and reused.
“However, times do move on. The options have been there to probably purchase this land. The landowner who is no longer with us set these plans in place, obviously many years ago,” he said.
“So, those opportunities have been, and probably have gone by. So, we are asked to deal with something that is doable project, an allowable project, and all of the concerns that have been thrown to us in recent times, have been addressed.”
Cr Adam Guise said he was of the clear view the development should be refused.
“Its impacts on the environment and the social and economic impacts cannot be adequately mitigated,” he said.
“The site is unsuitable for a development such as this being near a very busy, traffic-congested intersection, near residences and near Hollingworth Creek, and it’s certainly not in the public interest.
“It’s a service station in a town that already has numerous service stations. There’s already a service station north across on Elliott Road and further along the Bruxner Highway and others in close proximity.
“There will be profound traffic impacts, increasing from something like 48 car movements in peak hour to 121 – a significant increase for an already congested intersection. The conditions to change traffic movements they do not address this aspect; they do not address the increase of traffic that we’ll be using this development.”
Cr Guise said further to that, the proposal was to put a fuel depot on the floodplain near a creek.
“That, in my mind is a reason alone to refuse it. It’s a development completely unsuited to the floodplain and despite the assurances about the technology involved, things go wrong, these places leak and it should not be in close proximity to a creek,” he said.